Pema – The Treason Clause

Video

Written Component

After the failure of the Articles of Confederation, soon after its ratification in 1777, the Founding Fathers wanted a Constitution that was strong enough to run the country while being conscious of potentially giving the government too much power and not protecting the people’s rights enough. The Articles of Confederation didn’t centralize the power under the federal government enough and gave the states too much individual power which led to its replacement in 1789. The Treason Clause in section 3 of Article 3 is one important article that helped to restrain the power of the government in the Constitution. The Founding Fathers were concerned about the possibility of treason being weaponized by a future president to silence the people and any political opposition. The Founding Fathers incorporated the Treason Clause to prevent the government from becoming too powerful and becoming like the British monarchy. 

The Constitution defines treason as an act of an American betraying the allegiance that they owe to their country. The Treason Clause limits treason to two different kinds: treason by waging war against the U.S. and treason by helping the enemies of the U.S. by providing them “aid and comfort”. In order to sentence someone for treason, there must either be two witnesses that can testify to the same treasonous action or the accused person has to confess in open court. If someone is convicted of treason, Congress has jurisdiction and is able to make the punishment. However, the punishment has to be one that only the convicted person pays. Congress cannot extend the punishment to the convicted person’s family or the next generation of the family.

Over the years, many different cases have been made from different interpretations of the Treason Clause because what qualifies as treason was never fully specified. One example of this was in the case of Ex parte Bollman & Swarthout where levying war was clarified. Bollman and Swarthout were two of Aaron Burr’s associates who came forward accusing Aaron Burr of plotting treason to overthrow the government in New Orleans. Ultimately, the Supreme Court decided that Aaron Burr was not guilty of treason and the distinction was made between conspiring to commit treason and taking action to commit treason. Conspiring to commit treason wouldn’t be considered treason but when steps/actions were taken, that would be considered treason.

The Treason Clause connects to an overarching theme of Enlightenment because some Enlightenment ideals were the idea of people having God-given rights and moving away from a monarchy and that’s exactly what the Treason Clause helps to accomplish. The Treason Clause protects the rights of people by offering safeguards to make it hard to be convicted of treason. The Treason Clause also limits the power of the government which helps balance the powers out evenly to prevent tyranny.


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

8 Responses to “Pema – The Treason Clause”

  1. c26mb1

    Loved your video, Pema! You did a great job of matching up well-modified pictures to your voice over, enhancing my understanding of the Treason Clause. I think that you balanced humor and comprehensibility well, and overall did a great job. I was wondering how you think we can differentiate between acts of treason and protected forms of free speech, dissent, or political opposition.

    Reply
  2. Isabella

    Hi Pema, great video! In terms of treason not being fully defined, do you think a good amendment would be to clarify that?

    Reply
  3. Amalia L.

    Pema, I really enjoyed the visuals you used, I thought as a whole they made your video very visually engaging and enjoyable to watch. I wonder if there are any pre-revolution cases that were particularly influential to the establishment of the treason clause. Great job!

    Reply
  4. c26ae@dalton.org

    Nice video Pema! I really enjoyed the images you picked. How is the treason clause an example of checks and balances within the Constitution?

    Reply
  5. c26sk1

    Nice video, Pema. Would you suggest amending this clause to provide a more specific definition of treason as there have clearly been a lot of arguments surrounding the loopholes found in the existing definition?

    Reply
  6. Charlotte Simon

    Pema you really did a great job with this video! You clearly explained the treason clause with the right about of clear, and understandable graphics!

    Reply
  7. c26kc

    Do you think the treason clause was a necessary amendment, what do you think would have happened without it?

    Reply
  8. Jacob Sorett

    Nice presentation Pema. Does the cruel punishments clause come in to affect with the Congresses sentencing?

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Isabella

Click here to cancel reply.