Leila – The Third Amendment

Video

Written Component

 

The Third Amendment

The Third Amendment was ratified on December 15, 1791 as part of the Bill of Rights, providing that soldiers cannot stay in American citizens’ private homes without the homeowners’ consent. It was in response to British soldiers taking over colonists’ homes without the owners’ approval during the colonial period. The British had passed the Quartering Acts of 1765 and 1774 which made the colonists’ lives and the intrusion of the British soldiers into their homes even worse.

These Acts stated that colonists had to house soldiers in barracks, and, if that was not an option, soldiers would come into people’s homes where their necessities would be provided and paid for. These Acts also stated that British soldiers could take over uninhabited buildings and barns, allowing even more spaces to be commandeered by the British. The colonists saw this as an invasion of property and privacy. In addition, many soldiers were sick with diseases including smallpox. The Third Amendment was a response to these Acts, and an important protection for private property, life and privacy. 

There are several interpretations of the philosophy behind the Third Amendment. One interpretation focuses on the Third Amendment as giving more power to civilians than the militia or the government. Another interpretation centers on the right to privacy. These themes are consistent with concepts supported by Enlightenment thinkers such as John Locke who promoted similar ideas about Natural Rights, regarding a limited government and protected rights of the people such as life, liberty and property.  Locke believed that governments should be based on these ideas.

Although the Third Amendment comes up infrequently in case law, it has been brought up in a few legal cases. In Griswold vs. Connecticut in 1965, a case about the right of married people to purchase birth control, the Amendment is cited as a protection of Americans’ privacy. In cases related to abortion, the Third Amendment has been used to argue that abortion rights are protected by inference in the Constitution. [1] Specifically, the Third Amendment protects privacy rights, and freedom from government interference in people’s homes. This is important because a right to “privacy” is not explicitly contained in the Constitution. Challengers to abortion rights often argue that since the specific right to privacy is not mentioned in the Constitution, cases that protect important human rights under a “privacy” analysis can be overruled. The Third Amendment gives some weight to privacy protections though often does not apply to cases not involving soldiers and homes. An interesting modern interpretation even speaks to the right to “freedom from infection” contained in the Third Amendment. [2]  One question would be if the Third Amendment served its purpose. If it was truly intended to protect privacy why didn’t it state that more clearly. A house is just a place, but a home is a place where you are free with privacy.

    1.  The Bill of Rights Institute, “Griswold v Connecticut (1965),” The Bill of Rights Institute, 2023, https://billofrightsinstitute.org/e-lessons/griswold-v-connecticut-1965.
    2. Alexander Zhang, “The Forgotten Third Amendment Could Give Pandemic-Struck America a Way Forward,” The Atlantic, May 31, 2020, https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/10/could-third-amendment-protect-against-infection/616791/.

(It wouldn’t do the proper indenting) 


Tags: , , , , , ,

9 Responses to “Leila – The Third Amendment”

  1. Jason Joseph

    I like how you broke down each of the individual reasons for the Third Amendment.

    Do you see a situation where there could be controversy involving the Third Amendment?

    Reply
  2. Tory Mogelof

    It is interesting that something so pertinent to the constitutional framers has so little relevance to us today. I believe RBG thought that building the right to an abortion on privacy grounds was a mistake. Do you agree?

    Reply
  3. Connor Smyth

    Love this video Leila! I wonder if this may become more irrelevant as our world continue to develop.

    Reply
  4. c26mn

    This is a really interesting amendment, I never realized this was such an important topic! Do you believe that if there are no infectious diseases (or any of the other reasons why this was created), this should still be in use?

    Reply
  5. Patrick Liu

    This was a really well done video regarding the 3rd Amendment! I learned a lot regarding how the Amendment works and the examples given such as the Griswold vs Connecticut helped further that understanding. That being said, how might you change the Third Amendment’s language and focus on soldiers and homes so that it can be further clarified to explicitly address broader notions of privacy in contemporary society?

    Reply
  6. Shreya Ranjan

    This is a really great explanation of the Third Amendment, and it’s really cool how you explained the Third Amendment’s connection to abortion and other concepts. Is there any modern scenario regarding the army itself that involves the Third Amendment around the border, especially given the large military of the United States and its troubled history with migrant and border control?

    Reply
  7. Katherine Gumina

    Leila! You video is excellent and your explanations were very clear and informative. Why is this notion an amendment if it is a response to British behavior?

    Reply
  8. Elsa

    Comment: I found it very interesting that even though the Third amendments part about the military housing isn’t as present in this time, it is still adapted to modern time, and modern rights of privacy.
    Question: Has this amendment ever had any arguments against it, or cases of debate over interpretation?

    Reply
  9. Mujtaba Raja

    Leila, excellent work! I enjoyed your animations. What would you change about your amendment?

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Patrick Liu

Click here to cancel reply.