Video
Written Component
On July 4th, 1776, the United States of America announced to the world their independence from Britain. However, America’s path to the country it is today was not finalized right then and there. Instead, it would be another 11 years before the Constitution that is still in place now was written. When the founding fathers met in Philadelphia, 1787, to write the Constitution, they had quite a tall task set out for them. There were many uncertainties centered around the new government of the still young nation and many heated debates. However, one unanimous agreement was that the new form of government had to look much different from Britain’s. So instead of having a monarchy, America was assembled into a democratic republic. The government was divided into three branches; the executive, the legislative, and the judicial. The executive branch was of course the president of the United States. It was extremely important that the Constitution had measures in place in order to make sure that not one person could possess too much power and become a monarchial dictator. This is why checks and balances can be seen throughout Article 2 of the Constitution, and the whole document for that matter. One of the largest and most important checks and balances was the Impeachment Clause in Article 2, Section 4.
Article 2, Section 4 of the Constitution, also known as the Impeachment Clause, established the grounds by which a President, Vice President, and other civil officers could be impeached and removed from their positions. If they were to be convicted of treason, bribery, and other “high crimes and misdemeanors” they could be removed from office. However, since there is no definition of high crimes and misdemeanors in the Constitution, its interpretation has been subject to debate between many historians.
One of the early drafts of the Constitution wrote that Congress had the ability to impeach officers for “maladministration.” However, James Madison was famously opposed to this idea because he felt the term was too vague. He believed that the word maladministration would allow for impeachment without any real reason. With this being said, one matter of debate was whether the Constitution should have had more specific wording in what could be considered as an impeachable offense. Chief Justice John Marshall famously argued that since the Constitution was written to endure for many years, its language had to be vague. The Constitution had to be ready for anything Americans threw at it. The founding fathers certainly could not predict the future — if they had been specific in their language in the Impeachment Clause, it is likely that an official today could evade punishment today due to some small technicality, or modern interpretation.
I personally believe it is important that the Constitution remains vague. It is impossible to write a document designed to be used for centuries with extremely specific details since standards and ideals will inevitably change over time. Additionally, I do believe there are some problems with the Impeachment Clause that could be amended. While three presidents have been impeached in US history, zero have been removed from office. In many scenarios, political parties can get in the way of convicting a civil officer. A senator is often unlikely to vote in favor of impeaching another member of the same party as them. This senator may rely on the same supporters as the person they are impeaching, and voting to remove them from office could be a huge political risk. Impeachment is a powerful and important tool. It is key in maintaining democracy — this is why the Impeachment Clause should be amended slightly to account for political parties so that officers can still be removed from their position if necessary.
Tags: 2, 4, article, article-2-section-4, article-ii-section-iv, augie, augie-emmanuel, augie-emmanuel-article-2, clause, constitution, constitution-project, emmanuel, impeachment, impeachment-clause, section, section-4-impeachment-clause
7 Responses to “Augie Emmanuel Article 2, Section 4: Impeachment Clause”
c26mb1
Nice job, Augie! I can tell you put a lot of work into this and your voice over was fantastic. I think you could have modified your pictures a bit more to better fit with your script, but the video was still very good. My question is: can a sitting president be indicted or prosecuted for criminal offenses, or is impeachment the only constitutional solution?
Isabella
Hi Augie, good video! In terms of amending the Impeachment Clause for political parties, in what way should this amendment occur? What should it account for to help support impeachments actually happening?
Amalia L.
I really enjoyed this video, I thought the images were really visually engaging and I thought the context given was very substantive. I thought your idea about how the vagueness of some of the constitution helps to secure itself throughout time was really interesting, but it also makes me wonder about what vagueness may take away from the writing and its intended purpose. As well as this, I found the idea of amending to account for political parties was also very interesting.
c26sk1
Nice video, Augie. You make a good point about senators not wanting to vote to impeach one whose supporters they rely on. What specifically would you want to amend in order to account for political parties?
c26pt@dalton.org
I loved how easy your video was to understand and the well-placed images! One question I had was what amendments would you suggest making to the impeachment clause?
c26kc
What exactly would you add to the impeachment clause to improve it?
Jacob Sorett
Great presentation. Do you have examples of people of all governmental offices who have been impeached?