{"id":280,"date":"2023-06-02T14:13:42","date_gmt":"2023-06-02T14:13:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.dalton.org\/theconstitution\/the-free-exercise-clause-and-arguments-for-and-against-religious-exemptions\/"},"modified":"2023-06-02T21:25:50","modified_gmt":"2023-06-02T21:25:50","slug":"the-free-exercise-clause-and-arguments-for-and-against-religious-exemptions","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.dalton.org\/theconstitution\/the-free-exercise-clause-and-arguments-for-and-against-religious-exemptions\/","title":{"rendered":"The Free Exercise Clause and Arguments for and against Religious Exemptions"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Video<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-video is-provider-youtube wp-block-embed-youtube wp-embed-aspect-16-9 wp-has-aspect-ratio\"><div class=\"wp-block-embed__wrapper\">\n<div class=\"entry-content-asset\"><iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"The Free Exercise Clause and Arguments for and against Religious Exemptions\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/jdAr47GQXD0?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/div>\n<\/div><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Written Component<\/h3>\n\n\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Free Exercise clause is a clause in the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. This amendment was ratified alongside nine others. These first ten amendments are collectively known as the Bill of Rights. By providing the people with guaranteed natural rights in these amendments, the government hoped to appease opposition to the Constitution on the grounds that it would give the federal government far too much power. The Free Exercise clause is a section of the First Amendment that protects freedom of religion. Many early Americans viewed religious freedom as one of the most important and fundamental natural rights because several American colonies had been created by religious groups fleeing from persecution in Europe.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">By using the specific phrasing of \u201cfree exercise of religion,\u201d Congress, which wrote the Bill of Rights, made it clear that it was protecting not just religious convictions but also practices. Using this clause as their argument, many religious groups have sought to receive exemptions from laws on the grounds that they interfere with their religious convictions or practices. In different time periods, the Free Exercise clause has been interpreted differently in order to either permit or disallow religious exemptions. In 1972, the Supreme Court decided in the case <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Wisconsin v. Yoder<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> that governments could not apply laws that go against religious beliefs to the holders of said beliefs unless they had a \u201ccompelling interest\u201d to do so. This ruling allowed for religious exemptions to occur for many laws. However, in 1990, the Supreme Court ruled in <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Employment Division v. Smith<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> that religious groups could not be exempted from religiously neutral laws that disallow religious practices or enforce doctrine contrary to religious classes. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">One large reason for this ruling was the fear that by being exempt from laws just because of religious beliefs, people would be above the law. The argument of whether or not to grant religious exemptions is one of the greatest areas of dispute about the Free Exercise clause. To argue in favor of religious exemptions, it could be said that in most cases, awarding these exemptions results in practically no detriment to anyone and therefore it would only be a benefit to religious individuals who want to comply with their beliefs. On the other hand, James Madison, one of the most influential writers of the Bill of Rights and Constitution, wrote that while people should not be mistreated on account of their religion, no special privileges should be given for religious beliefs. Based on this information, an argument can be made that the intended meaning of the Free Exercise clause was not to permit religious exemptions, and therefore none should be given.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">While it may be true that the Framers may not have intended for the Free Exercise clause to be interpreted in a way that allows for religious exemptions, the manner in which they wrote it seems to evoke the idea. Additionally, when a religious exemption does not cause any harm to other people, there is no reason not to support it. It is simply ridiculous to say that no one should get religious exemptions even when they cause no harm to anyone else. James Madison may have thought otherwise, but it is perfectly fair to give religious exemptions in cases where there are no adverse effects.<\/span><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Free Exercise clause is a clause in the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. This amendment was ratified alongside nine others.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4621,"featured_media":187,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[180,177,178,25,79,182,176,151,179,175,186,183,185,181,184,19,174],"class_list":["post-280","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-against","tag-and","tag-arguments","tag-bill-of-rights","tag-clause","tag-exemptions","tag-exercise","tag-first-amendment","tag-for","tag-free","tag-free-exercise","tag-noah","tag-noah-sheff","tag-religious","tag-sheff","tag-the","tag-the-free-exercise-clause-and-arguments-for-and-against-religious-exemptions"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dalton.org\/theconstitution\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/280","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dalton.org\/theconstitution\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dalton.org\/theconstitution\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dalton.org\/theconstitution\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4621"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dalton.org\/theconstitution\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=280"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dalton.org\/theconstitution\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/280\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dalton.org\/theconstitution\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/187"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dalton.org\/theconstitution\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=280"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dalton.org\/theconstitution\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=280"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.dalton.org\/theconstitution\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=280"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}