Why The Wizard of Oz is a BAD Adaptation of the book

In the before I thought the Wizard of Oz was a good adaptation of the book. Why? I’ll tell you why because it was a good movie and it has the main point, a girl comes down in a cyclone meets some friends and goes to a wizard who can not help her. But girl was I wrong! In fact is doesn’t even have the same theme! Here are some important parts from the book that you people who haven’t read the movie missed. The lion doesn’t fight a giant spider and earns respect from all animals in the jungle and becomes king of the jungle, it turns out that in the book was not a dream and that Aunt Em and Uncle Henry shows happiness and love to see her again, Dorothy lives in a gray Kansas prairie and only lives with Aunt Em Uncle Henry and Toto, there is no golden cap that lets the owner control the winged monkeys for three times, there is no Glinda the witch of the south there is only Glinda witch of the north. These are only few of the many important parts that the movie missed. If you don’t believe now you never will! Oh did I mention that no body whats to hurt Dorothy because the Witch of The North has kissed her and that Glinda (the one they cut out) is the one that gets her home? Well good bye and if you want to see the many important parts that they missed read the book! Then they cut out the wicked monkeys getting her home and this and that and oh ya…

P.S What I am saying is that it is a bad adaption not a bad movie, in fact I love the movie!

No Responses to “Why The Wizard of Oz is a BAD Adaptation of the book”

No comments yet

Leave a Reply